Hence the beam 1 has a higher Area moment of inertia.
This is because the beam 1 has a higher area moment of inertia about the bending axis compared to the beam 2.Īs you can see the area of the beam cross-section 1 is concentrated more away from the bending axis than in the beam 2. It can be seen that bending is low in case 1 compared to case 2. The only thing that changes is its geometry. Also, same beam, same area, same Young’s Modulus. In the picture shown, the cross-section of the plank is the same in both cases. It can be explained by a simple illustration. It is completely independent of the mass and other mechanical properties of the body. It can be defined as the resistance offered by a cross-sectional area to bending. Like, Young’s modulus is a stiffness due to material it is made of. Quick Answer: It is just a name that we gave to stiffness due to the shape of an element. So what is this “I” which is used all over in structural application? It is the Area Moment of Inertia or Second Moment of Area. The moment of inertia represented by “I” and used in deflection calculations of a beam, buckling load calculations of a column and in many other places in structural engineering has nothing related to the terms Mass or Inertia. Is this the parameter which is widely used in structural engineering as “ I“? The answer is NO! But what if the body is in a rotating motion? The resistance offered to the angular acceleration by a rotating body is called Moment of inertia (or) Mass moment of inertia. Now, this can be said for a body in a linear motion. Inertia is a property of a body under which it continues to be in a state of rest or uniform motion until it is acted upon by an external force.
0 kommentar(er)
